As readyed in our report of the late conference on child safety seats.

As readyed in our report of the late conference on child safety seats, the issue is whether carry-on infants are to have sexual delight with the same level of security as carry-on bags. We not absent below additional items on the subject:

* The lengthy history. For 20 years now, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has been trying to eliminate lapchildren in favor of exact restraints for all infants and small children. Although none of the 6 "infants-in-arms" was killed in the December 1978 crash of a United Airlines [UAL] DC-8 at Portland, Oregon, in a 1979 literal meaning to then-Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) head Langhorne constraint the Board expressed its "great concern" about "the lack of adequate restraints for infants" (one of whom was rejected during the crash but miraculously escaped injury). The Board commited expedited research and "early rulemaking" to effectively "restrain infants and small children during in-flight inverts and survivable crash landings."

* Automotive infant seat issues. common of the footnotes to this note noted research by the FAA's Civil Aeromedical Institute (CAMI). A 1978 CAMI report mentioned "the inadvisability of using automotive infant seats in aircraft..." Fast forward to the instant for one reason why auto seats may not be suitable: a fresh report by the Washington (DC) Area fresh Automobile Dealers Association (WANADA) rest that 80 percent or more of the seats are installed incorrectly in automobiles. The member dealerships have been conducting courtesy checks of installed seats. Kip Killman, president of a local Ford dealership, said that since his company began conducting installation checks in 1996 "We consistently find almost 98-99% of the seats installed incorrectly." Note that these seats are being improperly installed in autos with which parents are familiar, and while not rushed as they would be during airplane boarding. The likelihood that auto seats would not be in a strict sense installed in airline seats with which parents would be equable less familiar was one of the factors prompting Virgin Atlantic Airways' policy to provide aircraft-compatible child safety seats, and to prohibit the use of automobile seats in its aircraft.

* Time to implement. According to a Virgin official, it took les than brace years from decision to deployment "The decision to travel to our own seat was made in July 1990 and the first seat was fitted to our aircraft in March 1992 greatest in number of this time the manufacturer was going by the and of the process of gaining CAA (Civil Aviation Authority) approval. This was achieved in January 1992" the official recounted

* Where to next? Virgin Atlantic is looking at other child restraint seats to descry if the safety benefit introduced in 1992 can be further improved. The carrier also is actively considering deployment of restraints designed for the special privations of disabled children.

...

Home